There are 2 owner-reported driver assist & adas complaints for the 2025 Lexus RXin NHTSA's database. These are unverified consumer reports and may not reflect confirmed defects.
On November 11, 2025, while reversing inside a garage, the rearview camera image— which had initially displayed correctly on the vehicle’s screen—suddenly froze while the vehicle remained in reverse mode. At the same time, the Pre-Collision System (PCS) failed to engage the brakes while the vehicle was traveling at approximately 2–3 miles per hour. As a result, the vehicle struck the garage structure and sustained damage. Toyota investigated this incident (Case #XXX) but based its conclusion on the incorrect assumption that I had reported either a brake system malfunction or a complete absence of an image on the display (a dark or blank screen). Because of this, Toyota determined that it could not provide assistance regarding the resulting vehicle damage. This characterization is inaccurate. The issue was not a blank screen. The rearview camera image appeared normally and then froze while the vehicle was still in reverse. My vehicle is currently subject to Recall Campaign No. 25LA06, which addresses reliability issues involving critical safety-related electronic systems. The rear visibility system is a federally mandated safety feature under 49 CFR §571.111 (Rear Visibility Requirements). When the image freezes during active vehicle operation, the system no longer provides the required real-time visibility necessary for safe reversing. Given the existence of an active recall campaign aimed at addressing reliability issues within the vehicle's electronic safety systems, this malfunction should be considered potentially linked to a defect covered by Recall Campaign No. 25LA06. The failure of the rear-view system during vehicle operation directly contributed to the occurrence of the collision.
I was driving the vehicle up a road I drive every day, when suddenly the instrument cluster showed a picture of a red pedestrian icon, and slammed on the breaks. It threw me forward, but quickly proceeded on like normal. It detected a pedestrian that was not in front of the vehicle. This was only 20 days after I got the car. It proceeded to do this three more times, with similar severity, but at different speeds and different locations. The fourth instance, I was driving home and the vehicle had the same pedestrian detection of an imaginary person, this time breaking me from 40 mph to 12 mph with a car behind me. Thank the lord I was not hit. I made a service appointment asap, and it was there for 8 days. I had it happen to me 5 times in 3300 miles and 2.5 months, and they drove it 12 miles and said they couldn’t duplicate it. Cooperate told me to send it up to another store which I did. It has now been there for 16 days, and they can’t find an issue either. I am not comfortable driving the car because it could have a breaking incident at any time, and is putting me in danger. Cooperate has told me to file a lemon case or quote “wait for it to happen again and try and document it in better detail.” I have given them locations, time and date estimates and weather estimates for every instance, and I’m still getting put back in a car that someone at Hendrick Lexus North considered a “liability.” I am beyond disappointed in Lexus for going against their word, is making me the guinea pig in a effort to try to replicate the issue. This is my third Lexus, and my image of the brand is ruined.
Complaints are unverified consumer reports submitted to NHTSA. A high complaint count may reflect vehicle popularity, not defect severity. Data sourced from NHTSA public records.
Data synced from NHTSA on Apr 26, 2026