There are 2 stored owner reports matching the visibility & wipers leading-label group for the 2010 Dodge Caliber in our NHTSA-sourced dataset. These are unverified consumer reports and may not reflect confirmed defects.
This group counts stored reports whose component label starts with one of this site's matching prefixes, ignoring case. Each matching report counts once within the group. Components mentioned later in the label or only in the narrative are not searched. How component counts work
Loaded 2 of 2 matching reports.
Open the full vehicle complaint log (all categories)I HAVE BEEN HAVING ISSUES WITH MY WIPERS GOING ON BY THEMSELVES WHEN I USE MY TURN SIGNALS TO TAKE EITHER A RIGHT OR LEFT TURN IT DOESN'T SEEM TO MATTER. IT DOESN'T HAPPEN ALL THE TIME BUT QUITE OFTEN. *TR
2010 DODGE CAILBER. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO FRONT WINDSHIELD PROBLEM. *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED WHILE DRIVING HOME, HE NOTICED SMALL CRACKS IN THE WINDSHIELD. SOME WERE STRAIGHT, BUT MOST WERE CURVED AND SOME WERE ALMOST A PART CIRCLE LIKE THE EDGE OF A BUBBLE. THE CONSUMER BELIEVED THE FLAWS WERE IN THE CENTER LAYER OF THE GLASS BECAUSE THE OUTER SURFACE SEEMED COMPLETELY SMOOTH. THE CRACKS COULD ONLY BE SEEN WHEN ONE LOOKED THROUGH THE WINDSHIELD INTO THE LIGHT. THE CRACKS CAUSED REFRACTIONS OF LIGHT THAT HINDERED THE VISION OF THE CONSUMER. THE CONSUMER SHOWED THE FLAWS TO THE SERVICE MANAGER AT THE DEALER. THEY WERE PHOTOGRAPHED AND SENT TO CHRYSLER CORPORATION. THEY AGREED THAT THE WINDSHIELD WAS FLAWED. A TECHNICIAN WAS SENT TO INSTALL A NEW WINDSHIELD. ONE EVENING WHILE DRIVING HOME, THE CONSUMER NOTICED THE NEW WINDSHIELD HAD THOUSANDS OF SMALL CRACKS JUST LIKE THE ORIGINAL ONE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER THE NEXT MORNING. THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THAT A FACTORY REP. WOULD NEED TO LOOK AT THE WINDSHIELD, SINCE IT WAS ALREADY REPLACED ONCE. OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL MONTHS, APPOINTMENTS WERE CANCELLED WITH THE FACTORY REP. FOR VARIOUS REASONS. THE SERVICE MANAGER CONTACTED THE CONSUMER AND INFORMED HIM AN APPOINTMENT HAD BEEN RE-SCHEDULED FOR THE FOLLOWING WEEK. HOWEVER, THE DAY BEFORE THE APPOINTMENT, IT WAS CANCELLED AGAIN. WHEN THE CONSUMER FINALLY MET THE FACTORY REP. HE POINTED OUT THAT THE CRACKS WERE IN THE OUTER LAYER OF THE GLASS BECAUSE HE COULD ROLL A FINE BALL POINT PEN ACROSS THEM AND HE COULD FEEL A DRAG AS IT CROSSED THE CRACK. THEN HE STATED IT WAS CAUSED BY GRAVEL. THE CONSUMER STATED IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE FOR GRAVEL OR ANYTHING ELSE TO IMPACT THE GLASS THAT WOULD CAUSE TINY CRACKS WITHOUT CAUSING CHIPS OR PITS. THE FACTORY INFORMED THE CONSUMER THERE WAS NOTHING MORE HE COULD DO. *JB
Complaints are unverified consumer reports submitted to NHTSA. A high complaint count may reflect vehicle popularity, not defect severity. Data sourced from NHTSA public records.
NHTSA source checks for this vehicle year
Checks are recorded separately for each dataset, not for the whole page. Dates use UTC. A missing check date does not mean no records exist.
Vehicle import recorded: Apr 28, 2026. This is the stored import date, not confirmation that every source was successfully refreshed.