There are 4 stored owner reports matching the lighting leading-label group for the 2009 Mazda CX-7 in our NHTSA-sourced dataset. These are unverified consumer reports and may not reflect confirmed defects.
This group counts stored reports whose component label starts with one of this site's matching prefixes, ignoring case. Each matching report counts once within the group. Components mentioned later in the label or only in the narrative are not searched. How component counts work
Loaded 4 of 4 matching reports.
Open the full vehicle complaint log (all categories)BOTH REAR TAIL LIGHTS LOOKED CLOUDY AND THE RED COLOR OF THE REAR LIGHTS APPEARED WHITE. I REMOVED THE LIGHT BULBS, THINKING THAT MAYBE THEY HAD BURNED OUT. I NOTICED THE LIGHT BULBS HAD MELTED THROUGH THE INTERNAL RED PLASTIC LENS OF THE TAIL LIGHT ASSEMBLY AND LEFT A HOLE ABOUT THE SIZE OF A QUARTER THAT ALLOWS THE WHITE LIGHT FROM THE BULB TO SHINE THROUGH. THE MELTED PLASTIC WAS ALL OVER THE BULBS AND THERE WAS A BURNT PLASTIC ODOR. THE 7743 BULBS WERE BOTH ORIGINAL TO THE CAR FROM MAZDA WHEN I PURCHASED THE CAR NEW IN JULY 2009. I NOTIFIED MAZDA CORPORATE AND THEY HAD ME TAKE IT TO MY DEALER. THEY INSPECTED THE LIGHTS AND SAID MAZDA WAS WILLING TO OFFER A $500 GOODWILL TO REPLACE THE TAIL LIGHT ASSEMBLY. THAT WILL NOT COVER THE COST OF $1226.77 WITHOUT LABOR TO HAVE THE DEALER REPLACE THE TAIL LIGHTS. THEY GAVE ME A CASE REF# 1-174187018. THERE SHOULD BE A RECALL FOR THIS ISSUE AND THE CONSUMER SHOULD NOT HAVE TO PAY TO GET THE LIGHTS REPLACED. THIS IS A PROBLEM WHEN THE LIGHT BULBS BURN THROUGH THE PLASTIC TAIL LIGHT ASSEMBLY. THIS IS A DESIGN FLAW.
MAZDA CX7 2009 REAR LENS, LIGHT BULB MELTS INTERNAL RED PLASTIC, ISSUE ALL 2007 TO 2009 CX7. A SAFETY ISSUE REAR STOP LIGHT AND DRIVING LIGHT WILL NOT REFLECT THE RED COLOR. *TR
EXCESSIVE CONDENSATION IN FRONT HEADLIGHTS. AT 3:00PM AFTERNOON CONDENSATION IS STILL PRESENT IN HEADLIGHT (85 DEGREES F). THIS HUMIDITY HAS TO GO SOMEWHERE AND THERE ARE ELECTRIC COMPONENTS IN THE BACK AND NEAR THE HEADLIGHTS WITH WARNINGS. MAZDA REFUSES TO CORRECT OR CHANGE HEADLIGHTS (MAZDA BULLETIN 09-016/09). *TR
NORMAL LOW LIGHT BEAM IS CUT OFF BY THE DESIGN OF THE SURROUNDING HOOD AREA OF THE VEHICLE. THIS DESIGN FACTOR CUTS OFF THE PROJECTED BEAM AND LIMITS THE DISTANCE OF CLEAR VISIBILITY. THE PROBLEM WAS DESCRIBED DURING DEALER SERVICE AND WAS TOLD, THAT IS HOW IT WAS DESIGNED. NO ADJUSTMENT OF LIGHT IS POSSIBLE IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THE NIGHT LOW BEAM VISIBILITY. THE HIGH BEAM IS NOT AFFECTED & SEEMS UNOBSTRUCTED. FOR DAYLIGHT RUNNING LIGHTS IT WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE BUT FOR LIMITING NIGHT LIGHT PROJECTION BY DESIGN IS QUESTIONABLE. IS THERE A REQUIREMENT FOR LOW BEAM MINIMUM PROJECTION? IF SO, THE ISSUE NEEDS STUDIED & CORRECTED. THIS PRESENTS A SAFETY CONCERN SINCE DISTANCE VISIBLE ON LOW BEAM IS DECREASED & OBSTRUCTED. ANY EXPLANATION OR HELP IN THIS MATTER IS APPRECIATED. *TR
Complaints are unverified consumer reports submitted to NHTSA. A high complaint count may reflect vehicle popularity, not defect severity. Data sourced from NHTSA public records.
NHTSA source checks for this vehicle year
Checks are recorded separately for each dataset, not for the whole page. Dates use UTC. A missing check date does not mean no records exist.
Vehicle import recorded: Apr 28, 2026. This is the stored import date, not confirmation that every source was successfully refreshed.