2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB

Subject: Safety Complaint – 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB (Active Recall) Reference: CMS Case #XXX Vehicle: 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB VIN: [XXX] I am filing a safety complaint regarding an active recall on my vehicle and the lack of a clear, safe resolution. The vehicle is currently under an active safety recall, and we have been advised it may not be safe to operate under certain conditions. At the same time, the dealership has informed us that the vehicle cannot be traded in due to the recall. This has left us in a position where: * We may not be able to safely drive the vehicle * We cannot trade or dispose of the vehicle * We have not been given clear guidance on safe use or storage Mercedes-Benz USA (CMS Case #21602523) has declined a repurchase and offered only partial goodwill compensation without providing a clear, actionable solution. We are concerned that consumers are being left with a vehicle that may be unsafe to operate and cannot be reasonably removed from service. We are requesting review and guidance on: 1. Whether the vehicle is safe to operate 2. Manufacturer responsibility in resolving recall-related limitations 3. Consumer protections in situations where a recalled vehicle cannot be used or traded This situation creates safety, liability, and consumer protection concerns, especially as we must leave the vehicle unattended while traveling internationally. Sincerely, [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

The contact owns a 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4Matic. The contact received a recall notification, NHTSA Campaign Number: 26V073000 (Electrical System); however, the parts were unavailable. The dealer was contacted, and the contact was informed that parts would not be available until December 2026. In addition, the contact stated that the vehicle was a fire risk. The manufacturer was contacted, but no assistance was provided. The contact had not experienced a failure.

I purchased a Mercedes EQB 250+ (2023) in December 2025 from W.I. Simonson Mercedes-Benz in Santa Monica, CA(certified dealership). In April 2026, I discovered a recall affecting certain EQB vehicles through a Facebook forum. After entering our VIN into the official recall database, we confirmed that our vehicle is subject to a recall issued in February 2026. We did not receive any notification (mail, email, or otherwise) from either the dealership or Mercedes-Benz regarding this recall. I contacted the dealership’s Service Department to inquire about the recall and repair options. I was informed that: •The required parts are currently unavailable •Parts are not expected until approximately December 2026 •I should contact Mercedes-Benz corporate for further assistance I contacted Mercedes-Benz customer support and provided my personal details (name, phone number, VIN, address). I explained that: •The recall involves a serious safety concern (potential fire risk) •I have an infant and cannot safely operate the vehicle •I require a loaner vehicle or alternative transportation immediately The representative: •Confirmed that a case was opened •Advised that a follow-up would occur within 7 days I contacted the dealership again to request a loaner vehicle. I was advised that: •Loaner vehicles are only provided when a vehicle is actively undergoing service •Since parts are unavailable, the vehicle cannot be taken in for service Therefore, a loaner vehicle cannot be provided After escalation, a Service Advisor confirmed: •The dealership cannot provide a loaner under these circumstances •Resolution must be pursued directly with Mercedes-Benz corporate Corporate may potentially offer: •A loaner vehicle •A vehicle buyback The vehicle is not safe to operate, leaving me without reliable transportation No loaner vehicle or alternative transportation has been provided Responsibility has been deferred between the dealership and manufacturer

They’re not replacing my car in a timely manner under the recall and they keep promising to call me and they don’t.

The contact owns a 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB 250. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, and while starting the vehicle, there was an abnormal sound coming from the vehicle. There was no warning light illuminated. The contact stated that the charger became inoperable and failed to charge above 80 percent. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 26V073000 (Electrical System); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The dealer was contacted, but the vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The dealer confirmed that the part was not available for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the failure. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The approximate failure mileage was 43,000.

The contact leased a 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4Matic. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 26V073000 (Electrical System); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The dealer was contacted. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The contact expressed safety concerns and stated that several related recalls were previously performed on the vehicle. Additionally, the contact stated that the vehicle failed to perform according to the lease agreement. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue and offered a monetary compensation that required the contact to sign a release form. Additionally, the manufacturer informed the contact that the vehicle did not meet the State’s Lemon Law criteria. The contact declined the monetary compensation. The contact had not experienced a failure.

The contact owns a 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB 250+. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 26V073000 (Electrical System). The contact was concerned about parking in the garage and driving the vehicle due to a potential fire. The local dealer was contacted and confirmed that the part for the recall repair was on back order. The dealer suggested a Trade-In. The manufacturer was not contacted. The contact had not experienced a failure.

I was informed that many cars of my make, and model have been recall they will not take into consideration the fact that it’s a safety concern for me now even though I’ve seat didn’t ask questions in regards to this car I know that this car in particular has had over 12,000 recalls for cars between 2022 and 2024 and I’ve asked the dealership to go ahead and see if they can assure me that my car‘s not gonna have a problem in the future and they can’t assure me they just told me to charge my car at 80% away from the house which is a little bit impossible since I do have my charging method next to our home I’ve asked for Goodwill. I’ve asked questions to see if they can help us out, but it feels like they really don’t care about the concern. They’re more worry about the value of the car, but at this point, my husband and I are super disappointed because our car has also depreciated a lot because of this

Spoke with MB today and was told that the new battery for this recall would be available in late 2026 and that until then I should only park outside and not charge past 80%. When asked for a loaner car until they fixed the issue I was told no. Afraid to drive and or charge

The high-voltage battery system in my 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB 250+ is subject to NHTSA Recall 26V-073, the third recall issued for the same battery cell defect. The manufacturer has acknowledged that the two prior recall remedies (25V-050 and 25V-894, both software-based Battery Management System updates) were "failed remedies" that did not eliminate the risk of internal short circuit and thermal event (fire). The manufacturer has instructed all affected owners to park the vehicle outdoors and away from any structure and to limit charging to 80% state of charge until a full battery pack replacement can be performed. The battery replacement parts are not expected to be available until approximately December 2026 — roughly 9 months from the date of this complaint. These restrictions create a significant safety risk and loss of use for my household. I have a newborn infant and no viable outdoor parking option. The vehicle cannot be safely parked in my garage per the manufacturer's own instructions due to fire risk. My spouse cannot safely park away from our residence and transport an infant on foot. The vehicle was previously brought to an authorized Mercedes-Benz dealership for prior recall-related service. The underlying battery cell defect — attributed by the manufacturer to deviations in the supplier (Farasis Energy) production process — has not been resolved despite multiple repair attempts. The high-voltage battery is available for inspection upon request. No warning lamps or messages appeared prior to the recall notification. The defect is an internal cell-level issue that may cause thermal runaway without warning, whether the vehicle is parked, charging, or in operation. Two confirmed fire incidents among affected vehicles in the United States have been reported to NHTSA. I am requesting that this complaint be documented to support the record of this recurring, unresolved safety defect affecting approximately 11

I am submitting this complaint regarding an active fire‑risk recall on my Mercedes‑Benz EQB and MBUSA’s refusal to provide a safety remedy. My vehicle was previously placed under a no‑drive instruction due to the fire‑risk recall. MBUSA attempted a remedy, but that remedy failed, and the safety impairment remains. Despite this, MBUSA Customer Care has declined to confirm or deny a safety‑related repurchase and has stated that their goodwill options (loaner, rental, storage, and cash considerations) are their final position. These goodwill measures do not address the underlying safety defect. I have repeatedly asked MBUSA to confirm whether they are denying a safety‑related repurchase under the active fire‑risk recall, the prior no‑drive instruction, the failed remedy attempt, and the ongoing safety impairment. They have refused to answer this question and have stated there is no further escalation within their department. I am requesting NHTSA’s assistance in reviewing this matter, as the manufacturer has not provided a safety remedy and is refusing to address the safety‑related repurchase question. Thank you for your attention to this safety concern. [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

My 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 (VIN [XXX] ) is subject to a high-voltage battery safety recall involving a risk of internal short circuit and fire. Mercedes-Benz has acknowledged that the battery pack in affected vehicles can fail at high state of charge and may cause a thermal event while driving or parked. There is currently NO REMEDY available. Mercedes has already issued prior recalls attempting software fixes, but those did not resolve the defect. The manufacturer now states that the only remedy is full battery replacement, yet replacement battery packs are not available and no timeline has been provided. I have been instructed to park the vehicle outdoors due to fire risk. This is a major safety hazard that affects my home, property, and personal safety. The vehicle’s value is significantly diminished, and I am unable to use it normally because the manufacturer cannot repair it. Mercedes-Benz has failed to provide a remedy within a reasonable time for a serious safety defect. I am requesting NHTSA intervention to compel Mercedes-Benz to provide a repair, replacement vehicle, or buyback, as required under federal recall law when a remedy is unavailable. This situation is unacceptable for a safety-critical recall involving fire risk, and I am asking NHTSA to take action to ensure Mercedes-Benz complies with its obligations. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

The high-voltage battery cells in my vehicle, supplied by Farasis Energy, are prone to internal short circuits that can cause thermal runaway and vehicle fire. This defect poses a serious risk of fire while the vehicle is parked or in operation. Mercedes-Benz USA has acknowledged this defect through three separate recall campaigns (25V050, 25V894, and 26V073). The first two remedies — software updates — failed to prevent fires, including post-repair fires reported in Europe. Mercedes-Benz subsequently committed to full battery replacement as the only effective fix, but has not made repair scheduling available until approximately December 30, 2026. In the interim, Mercedes-Benz has instructed owners to: (1) park and charge exclusively outdoors, (2) limit charging to 80% of battery capacity. These extraordinary restrictions confirm that the vehicle remains a fire risk and is currently unfit for safe normal use.

“My 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB 350 is subject to NHTSA recall 26V073 involving a high-voltage battery defect that may cause a fire. The manufacturer has instructed me to limit charging to 80% and to park the vehicle outside due to fire risk. This significantly reduces the vehicle’s usable range and creates safety concerns. Due to this 80% charging limitation, the vehicle no longer provides sufficient range for my daily commute and cannot be reliably used for its intended purpose. The manufacturer has stated that the permanent remedy (battery replacement) is not yet available, with an estimated timeline extending into December 2026. I opened a case with Mercedes-Benz on April 3, 2026 (Case #[XXX]), and as of today no case manager has been assigned despite multiple follow-ups. As a result, I am operating a vehicle with a known safety defect that cannot be repaired and cannot be used as intended. This represents both a safety risk and a failure to provide a timely remedy for a safety recall INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

I am writing to formally notify the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) that Mercedes-Benz USA has failed to remedy a known safety defect within a reasonable amount of time, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 30120. This notification is submitted in relation to the recall issued under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act regarding the high-voltage battery cells in the 2023 EQB. The manufacturer has acknowledged that an internal short circuit within the battery cells may lead to a vehicle fire while driving or parked. Despite this, a timely and effective remedy has not been provided, leaving me to manage the following severe burdens: • Safety and Psychological Distress: Every time I operate this vehicle, I experience significant anxiety. My primary concern is the safety of my grandchildren; I am constantly haunted by the question of whether I could safely extricate them from the vehicle should it ignite while in motion. • Property and Liability Concerns: I am currently forced to park the vehicle away from other cars and structures to mitigate the risk of a conflagration. I am deeply concerned about my legal and financial obligations should the vehicle ignite and cause damage to third-party property or result in personal injury. • Diminished Performance: The vehicle currently exhibits a decreased mileage range, failing to meet the performance specifications promised at the time of lease. • Breach of Lease Terms: I am required to make full monthly lease payments as per my agreement. However, Mercedes-Benz is failing to uphold their portion of the contract by providing a vehicle that is safe, functional, and fit for its intended purpose. I request that the NHTSA investigate Mercedes-Benz’s delay in providing a definitive remedy and hold the manufacturer accountable for the loss of use and the inherent dangers posed by this defect. A car that "potentially could ignite into flames" at any moment is not a "remedied" vehicle under the law.

We purchased a 2023 Mercedes EQB (EV) 2 years ago. The car is part of a recall in which we are advised to not park near other cars and not charge at home. Thus making the car essentially not useable unless we take the risk. We are driving it, knowing that we could catch fire. We are parking it and charging it in our garage, knowing it could catch fire. We have no choice as Mercedes has not offered any loaner or rental option so we can park this car until the recall or buyback is complete. Mercedes has estimated December 2026 when a solution will be available and March 2027 to when we can expect it to be completed.

The car is subject to a NHTSA recall 26V073. Mercedes has scheduled warranty repair for December 31, 2026, or more than 9 months from now. Our dealer advises that the scheduled date is just a holding date; there is no assurance that the repair will occur on or before that date. Mercedes has also said in writing that "the battery replacement remedy is not yet available" and that we should complain to NHTSA if Mercedes does not fix this problem in a reasonable time. In the meantime, we are instructed to park the car outside and not to charge it more than 80%. (We've programmed it not to charge over 80%.) Even still, we are at risk that the car will burst into flames, potentially while we are in it, possibly with our grandchildren in the back seat. The other solution Mercedes has is that we should lease a different model at three times the cost of our present lease, thereby shifting the cost of this warranty issue onto us.

I was informed of this recall fire risk. And I contacted Mercedes dealership where I got the car. And they informed me that the battery is not available at this time. And to park the vehicle outside. I can’t do this because my charging port is located inside my garage. This is not a safe and the dealership won’t do anything about it.

The contact owns a 2023 Mercedes-Benz EQB300 4Matic. The contact received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 26V073000 (Electrical System); however, the part to do the recall repair was not yet available. The local dealer was contacted but the vehicle was not repaired. The contact stated that the manufacturer had exceeded a reasonable amount of time for the recall repair. The manufacturer was made aware of the issue. The contact had not experienced a failure.

I am reporting a serious safety hazard involving my Mercedes‑Benz EQB 350. Drive only 1.5 year, Jan 6, 2026, the vehicle suffered an electronic failure at LaGuardia Airport and became completely inoperable. It could not shift into Drive, Reverse, or Neutral and had to be towed to Mercedes‑Benz of Huntington for warranty repair. During service, the dealer performed a wheel alignment on Jan 16, 2026 without my authorization. I had previously declined alignment recommendations because my factory alignment was excellent and my tires were wearing evenly. Within four weeks of this unauthorized alignment (under 1,000 miles), all four tires developed severe inner‑edge destruction. Both rear tires wore down to exposed steel cords, causing air leakage and creating an imminent blowout risk. The front tires also show abnormal inner‑edge wear. The remaining tread on all tires is otherwise good, which is consistent with incorrect alignment rather than normal wear. An automotive engineer confirmed this rapid structural failure is physically impossible through normal driving and is a direct result of incorrect or defective alignment parameters set during the Jan 16 service. This unauthorized and incorrect repair turned my vehicle into a safety hazard for my family. I contacted Mercedes‑Benz USA (MBUSA) immediately and provided photos, documentation, and Case # CMS 20671727. For more than 14 days, MBUSA no response. Representatives gave inconsistent and implausible explanations, including blaming the towing process, which cannot cause this pattern of wear. MBUSA repeatedly redirected me back to the same dealer that performed the unauthorized repair, a clear conflict of interest. Their handling of this case shows dishonesty and an attempt to avoid responsibility, despite clear evidence of a safety‑related defect. I request that NHTSA review this matter as a potential safety defect involving electronic failure, unauthorized repair, incorrect alignment, and rapid tire degradation.