2011 Toyota Sienna Complaint Log

I TOOK MY CAR IN FOR AN OIL CHANGE AND ASKED THEM TO CHECK MY TIRES DUE TO MY PRESSURE LIGHT BEING ON AND THE CAR WAS DRIVING FUNNY. UPON INSPECTION IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THERE WAS A BUSTED BELT IN THE SIDEWALL. THIS IS THE SECOND TIRE I HAVE HAD TO REPLACE IN TWO MONTHS. ALSO, IT WAS STATED AT THIS TIME THAT MY CAR WILL NOT PASS INSPECTION DUE TO WEAR ON THE TREAD AND I WILL NEED TO BUY NEW TIRES BEFORE RE-REGISTERING MY VEHICLE. CAR IS LESS THAN ONE YEAR OLD WITH UNDER 20,000 MILES. *TR

I BOUGHT A 2011 TOYOTA SIENA XLE WITH BRIDGESTONE P35/55RF18 TIRES. THEY ARE THE ORIGINAL TIRES AND HAVE BEEN ROTATED ACCORDING TO SCHEDULE. AFTER 25,000 MILES, THEY ARE BALD. I NOTICED SLIPPING AND TIRE FAILURE, THEN INSPECTED THEM. THE FRONT TIRES LOOK LIKE RACING SLICKS WITH NO REMAINING TREAD.

VAN WAS PARKED ON A CITY STREET. I WAS TRYING TO PULL OUT OF A PARKING SPACE.I HAD MY FOOT ON THE BRAKE WHEN THE ENGINE REVVED UP AND LUNGED FORWARD. I HAD MY FOOT ON THE BRAKE, THE MAT WAS SECURED DOWN. I TOOK MY VAN IN TO HAVE THE TOYOTA DEALER CHECK. THEY COULDN'T FIND ANYTHING WRONG. THIS HAPPENED 3 DIFFERENT TIMES.

I WAS PARKING THE CAR AND NEEDED TO MOVE THE VEHICLE BACKWARD IN A PARKING LOT WITH A SLIGHT SLOPE. WHEN I ATTEMPTED TO MOVE THE SHIFT LEVER TO REVERSE THE LEVER LOCKED UP AND THE VEHICLE STARTED TO ROLL BACKWARD. I APPLIED THE BRAKES TO NO AVAIL AND THE ENGINE DIED. THE STEERING WAS LOCKED. THE IGNITION SWITCH ALSO LOCKED. THE VEHICLE STOPPED . I CALLED THE TOYOTA DEALER AND THE SERVICE MANAGER SAID TO APPLY THE BRAKES VIGOROUSLY, AT THE SAME TIME PUMP THE ACCELERATOR AND TURN THE IGNITION. I DID AND THE FUNCTIONS ALL STARTED WORKING. NO DAMAGE, NO INJURIES. THIS OCCURRED IN FREDERICKS BURG, TX THIS APPEARS TO BE THE SAME INCIDENT IN COMPLAINT # 10585286, DATED 3-17-2014. *TR

2011 TOYOTA SIENNA. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO DEFECTIVE TIRES *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED THE VEHICLE CAME EQUIPPED WITH GOODYEAR EAGLE TIRES. ON MARCH 2, 2012, A 10,000 MILE SERVICE WAS PERFORMED. HOWEVER, SIX DAYS LATER, THE CONSUMER AND HER HUSBAND EXPERIENCED A BLOWOUT ON THE REAR PASSENGER TIRE. A NEW TIRE WAS PURCHASED ON MARCH 9, 2012. ON APRIL 28, 2012, THE CONSUMER AND HER HUSBAND EXPERIENCED ANOTHER BLOWOUT ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE FRONT TIRE. THE CONSUMER HAS SINCE REPLACED ALL OF THE TIRES WITH A DIFFERENT BRAND. *JB

ON MARCH 3,2012 WHILE RETURNING FROM ASHEVILLE,NC TO OUR HOME IN GRAYSLAKE,IL WITH A FULL DAY OF NOTHING BUT INTERSTATE DRIVING OUR TIRE WARNING INDICATOR LIGHT CAME ON . WE PULLED OFF AT THE NEXT EXIT BY CALUMET CITY,IL. ASSUMING I JUST NEEDED TO ADD SOME AIR TO THE TIRE I WAS SURPRISED TO SEE THE WHOLE SIDEWALL SPLIT OPEN. WE HAD NOT HIT ANY SHARP OBJECTS OR POTHOLES,BUT THE RUN FLAT TIRE WAS RUINED. AS THE 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA AWD DOES NOT HAVE A SPARE AAA COULD NOT HELP TO REPLACE THE TIRE. THEY COULD TOW US TO THE NEAREST TOYOTA DEALERSHIP, BUT WHEN WE NOTIFIED THE DEALERSHIP THEY INFORMED US SINCE IT WAS LATE SATURDAY AFTERNOON THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE TIRE UNTIL MONDAY. WE THEN MADE THE DECISION TO HAVE THE VAN TOWED TO THE TOYOTA DEALERSHIP NEAREST OUR HOME(LIBERTYVILLE,IL) AT OUR EXPENSE.TOYOTA GLADLY REPLACED THE TIRE (WITH ONLY 9400 MILES OF WEAR) FOR $283.00 AND TOLD ME IF ANY COMPLAINTS TO TAKE THE TIRE TO A BRIDGESTONE DEALER. I INFORMED THE TOYOTA DEALERSHIP THAT IF THE AWD SIENNA HAD A SPARE AND IF I WOULD HAVE KNOWN BEFORE PURCHASING THIS VEHICLE IT DID NOT HAVE A SPARE I WOULD NOT BE IN THIS PREDICAMENT. I TOOK THE TIRE TO THE BRIDGESTONE DEALER . HE SAID IT LOOKED LIKE THE TIRE WAS DAMAGED(IT WAS NOT,IT JUST SPLIT APART) AND SAID HE WOULD SEND IT TO THE CORPORATE OFFICE TO BE EVALUATED. THIS WAS A MONTH AND A HALF AGO WITH NO RESPONSE. I AM AFRAID THIS WILL HAPPEN AGAIN. *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 11V560000 (EQUIPMENT:OTHER:LABELS) AND TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER FOR REPAIRS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE REMEDY STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER WOULD NOTIFY OWNERS OF THE RECALL AND PROVIDE A REMEDY WHEN ONE HAD BECOME AVAILABLE. THE REMEDY WAS FOR OWNERS TO RECEIVE A CORRECTED PLACARD ALONG WITH A REVISED OWNER'S MANUAL THAT STATED THAT THE ACTUAL WEIGHT OF THE VEHICLE, AT NO COST TO THE CONTACT. THE CONTACT WAS DISPLEASED WITH THE RECALL REMEDY AND STATED THAT INSTEAD OF MAILING A 'CORRECTED' MANUAL TO OWNERS, THE MANUFACTURER SHOULD REPAIR THE VEHICLE SO THAT IT WOULD MATCH THE WEIGHT STATED ON THE PLACE CARD AND IN THE OWNER'S MANUAL. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 12,000.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE THIRD ROW MIDDLE BEAT THAT RETRACTED FROM THE CEILING WAS TANGLED AROUND A CHILD'S WAIST WHILE SLEEPING. THE FAILURE ALMOST CAUSED THE SEAT BELT TO STRAGGLE THE CHILD. THE CHILD BEGUN TO TURN BLUE SO THE CONTACT HAD TO CUT THE SEAT BELT TO RELEASE THE CHILD. THE CONTACT CALLED THE MANUFACTURER AND FILED A COMPLAINT. THE DEALER WAS CONTACTED TO SECURE AN APPOINTMENT TO HAVE THE SEAT BELT REPLACED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 12,000.

THIS IS THE FIFTH TIME I HAVE PROBLEMS WITH THE BRAKES. I BOUGHT THIS CAR NEW. AT 7000 MILES, WHEN I HIT THE PEDAL, STEERING WHEEL AND CAR SHAKES AND VIBRATE. TOOK IT TO THE DEALER, CUT ROTORS, OK. AT ABOUT 15000 MILES SAME PROBLEM. THEY CUT THE ROTORS. AGAIN, ABOUT 22000, SAME PROBLEM AND NOW I HAD TO PAID BECAUSE WARRANTY EXPIRED,3 YEARS. I WROTE TO THE TOYOTA, EXPLAIN THE PROBLEM AND THY DECIDED TO REFUNDED ME THE MONEY I PAID,$500. NOW, ABOUT 32000 MILES I HAD THE SAME PROBLEM AND I BOUGHT THE BEST ROTORS ON THE INTERNET WITH HOLES, BECAUSE THEY SAID IT WAS THE HEAT. I PAID A MECHANIC TO INSTALLED THEM. WORK FINE FOR A WHILE, BUT AT ABOUT 40000 MILES THE CAR STAR SHAKING WHEN I HIT THE BRAKES. I BOUGHT NEW ROTORS AT AN AUTO PART AND REPLACED THE ROTORS AGAIN. NOW MY CAR HAVE 48800 MILES AND I HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM. I TOOK IT TO THE DEALER TODAY AND THEY STILL SAYS IS THE HEAT THAT WORN THE ROTORS. I HAD SO MANY CARS IN MY LIFE AND I NEVER HAD TO REPLACED THE ROTORS THAT OFTEN. I BELIEVED THERE IS A FACTORY DEFECT IN THIS CAR THAT CAUSE THIS PROBLEMS WITH THE BRAKE. TOYOTA DON'T WANT TO INVESTIGATE. I BEG YOU TO INVESTIGATE AND MAKE TOYOTA TO LOOK DEEPER IN THIS PROBLEM. I DON'T BUY THE HEAT CAUSE. THIS IS NOT NORMAL ON A NEW CAR. IT COST ME ALMOST $55,000. I DON'T THINK IS FAIR. I THINK I'M GOING TO TAKE LEGAL ACTION AGAINST TOYOTA AND SUE THEM. BUT FIRST, I'M LOOKING FOR YOUR HELP. I HAVE ALL THE RECEIPTS FOR THE 5 TIMES I FIX THE CAR. I ALSO SAVED THE ORIGINAL ROTORS AND THE SECOND ONES I BOUGHT. THE THIRD ROTORS ARE STILL ON THE CAR. MY NAME: [XXX] MY ADDRESS: [XXX] EMAIL: [XXX] PHONE: [XXX] CELL: [XXX] IF YOU NEED DOCUMENTS OR ANY PROOF, PLEASE CONTACT ME AT THE ABOVE PHONE. ALSO, YOU CAN CONTACT ME AT MY MD ADDRESS: [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

ON JULY 1ST 2013 I RECEIVED NOTICE OF A SAFETY RECALL, DUE TO RISK OF TIRE FAILURE AND A CRASH, WHEN TOWING WITH MY TOYOTA SIENNA. THE RECALL INDICATED THAT IF THE VEHICLE HAS A TOW HITCH, THE FACTORY INSTALLED TIRES WOULD BE REPLACED WITH NEW EXTRA LOAD TIRES. I HAD ALREADY REPLACED MY FACTORY INSTALLED RUN FLAT TIRES WITH NEW EXTRA LOAD TIRES AFTER ONE OF THE FACTORY INSTALLED RUN FLATS FAILED. I CONTACTED TOYOTA ON JULY 1ST TO REQUEST REIMBURSEMENT FOR MY EXPENSE. ON 9/18/13 TOYOTA INFORMED ME THAT THE DEALER WOULD INSPECT MY CAR TO DETERMINE WHETHER IT QUALIFIES. ON 9/20 DCH TOYOTA INSPECTED THE CAR AND INFORMED ME THAT THE CAR IS NOT ELIGIBLE BECAUSE MY TRAILER HITCH IS NOT A TOYOTA BRAND TRAILER HITCH. WHEN I PURCHASED THIS CAR, TOYOTA DID NOT HAVE TOYOTA HITCHES AVAILABLE AND RECOMMENDED WE GET ONE FROM HITCH, WHICH WE DID. NOW WE ARE TOLD THAT TOYOTA ISN'T RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RECALL BECAUSE THE HITCH ISN'T A TOYOTA BRAND. I SPOKE WITH A SUPERVISOR AT THE TOYOTA COMPANY TODAY, WHO VERIFIED THIS. THIS SEEMS IRRESPONSIBLE AND WRONG. THE CAR, WITH THE FACTORY INSTALLED RUN FLAT TIRES, WAS IMPROPERLY RATED FOR TOWING, MAKING MY VEHICLE UNSAFE TO USE FOR TOWING, REGARDLESS OF THE BRAND OF TRAILER HITCH BEING USED. TOYOTA SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING THE TIRES SINCE THE VEHICLE WAS IMPROPERLY RATED FOR TOWING UNLESS THE TIRES ARE REPLACED. TOYOTA INSISTS THAT THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION APPROVED THEIR PLAN TO REPLACE THE TIRES AND RENDER THE CAR SAFE FOR TOWING ONLY IF THE CONSUMER IS USING A TOYOTA HITCH. THERE MUST BE SOME MISUNDERSTANDING, AND I AM ASKING THAT YOU REVIEW AND REVISE THE AGREEMENT SO THAT ALL OWNERS OF TOYOTA SIENNAS THAT WERE IMPROPERLY RATED FOR TOWING WILL BE COVERED UNDER THE RECALL, EVEN IF THEIR TRAILER HITCH IS NOT A TOYOTA-BRAND HITCH. *JS

WHILE DRIVING 35 MPH ON A CITY STREET, I LOST BRAKE FUNCTION. I WAS ABLE TO COAST TO A COMPLETE STOP, THANKFULLY AVOIDING OTHER TRAFFIC AND OBSTACLES. ONCE I WAS STOPPED, I FOUND THAT THERE WAS A LONG BOLT ON THE FLOORBOARD UNDERNEATH THE GAS PEDAL. WHEN THE TOWTRUCK DRIVER ARRIVED, HE REACHED IN AND PULLED THE GAS PEDAL COMPLETELY OFF - THERE WAS NOTHING FASTENING IT TO THE CAR. HE WAS ABLE TO REINSTALL THE BOLT, BUT SAID THERE WAS "A PIECE" MISSING, AND TOWED IT TO THE TOYOTA DEALERSHIP. THE DEALER FOUND THAT TWO PEDAL PIVOT BOLTS WERE MISSING, AND THE ONE THAT WAS PRESENT (WHICH HAD ENDED UP ON THE FLOOR), WAS NOT SECURED BY A NUT. THEY SAID THAT THEY WERE NOT SURE WHY THIS HAPPENED - THAT IT COULD HAVE HAPPENED IN THE FACTORY - BUT SAID THAT THEY REPLACED THE THREE BOLTS AND TORQUED THEM PROPERLY, AND THAT IT WAS SAFE TO DRIVE. WE ASKED TO SPEAK WITH A MANAGER FOR BETTER EXPLANATION, AND THE MANAGER AVOIDED ALL OF OUR ATTEMPTS TO CONTACT FOR SEVERAL DAYS. *KB

WATER ACCUMULATING IN FOLD-DOWN COMPARTMENT FOR THIRD ROW SEATS. STANDING WATER NOTICED UNDER CARPET. DEALERSHIP UNABLE TO REPLICATE LEAK. *TR

AFTER PULLING OUT OF THE DRIVEWAY AND DRIVING FORWARD LESS THAN 100 YDS, THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO PULL LEFT AND RIGHT AS IF VEHICLE STABILITY CONTROL WERE TAKING OVER. VERY SHORTLY AFTER, THE VEHICLE CAME TO AN ABRUPT STOP WITH BRAKES SEEMINGLY APPLIED ON THEIR OWN (POWER BRAKE ASSIST?). THE SCREEN LIT UP WITH THE FOLLOWING WARNINGS, "CHECK ABS," "CHECK VSC," AND "CHECK BRAKE SYSTEM," FOLLOWED BY "HAVE YOUR VEHICLE CHECKED BY DEALER." THE ABS, VSC, EMERGENCY BRAKE, AND CHECK ENGINE LIGHTS ON THE DASH CAME ON AS WELL. UPON TAKING A LOOK UNDER THE HOOD, WE ALSO DISCOVERED WHAT APPEARED TO BE AN OIL LEAK AT THE HEAD GASKET. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER AND A TOYOTA ENGINEER WAS FLOWN IN TO HELP DIAGNOSE THE PROBLEM. THE RESULT WAS THEY CLEARED THE CODES, WIPED UP THE OIL, AND SAID THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE CAR. ABOUT A DAY AND A HALF LATER, THE EXACT SAME THING HAPPENED AGAIN WITH THE VEHICLE PULLING, WARNING LIGHTS, ETC. THIS TIME, THE DEALERSHIP SAID THAT THEY FOUND "HARD" CODES AND THAT THE FLOOR WIRE HARNESS NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE HAS NOW BEEN OUT OF SERVICE FOR 16 DAYS. WE SHALL SEE WHETHER THE WIRE HARNESS FIXES THE PROBLEM. THE DEALER SAID THEY PUT DYE IN THE ENGINE OIL TO TRY TO DETECT A LEAK. NOT SURE WHY THEY DIDN'T INVESTIGATE THE PROBLEM WHILE THE OIL WAS SITTING THERE. IT WAS VERY OBVIOUS WHERE THE LEAK WAS. *TR

ROOF RACK DETACHMENT ON HIGHWAY: WE HAVE THE TOYOTA SIENNA OEM ROOF RACK CROSS BARS INSTALLED WHEN WE PURCHASED THE VEHICLE, BUT NEVER HAD ACTUALLY ATTACHED ANYTHING TO THE CROSS BARS. WHILE DRIVING DOWN THE HIGHWAY, WE HEARD A BANG, LOOKED IN THE MIRROR AND SAW MY CROSS BAR IN THE ROAD. IMMEDIATELY, PULLED OVER AND CONFIRMED THAT THE CROSS BAR HAD IN FACT DETACHED FROM OUR CAR AND FELL IN THE ROAD BEHIND US. THE REMAINING CROSS BAR WAS STILL ON, BUT WAS COCKED AND THE TIGHTENING MECHANISM WAS LOOSE. OUR CONCERN: THE SPECIAL INSTALLATION PRACTICE HAS BEEN EXPLAINED TO ME BY THE PARTS MANAGER. APPARENTLY, THIS NEW CLAMP DESIGN REQUIRES THE USER ASSURE PERPENDICULAR ALIGNMENT OF THE LOWER CLAMP PLATE TO THE ROOF RACK, OTHERWISE WHEN YOU TIGHTEN THE SCREW YOU CAN GET A FALSE TIGHT SENSE, WHEN THE PLATE IS COCKED AND NOT TRUE. SO, I SEE MANY THINGS WRONG WITH THIS DESIGN: (1) TOO MUCH RELIANCE ON FOLLOWING PROPER INSTALLATION TO ASSURE PRODUCT IS SAFELY SECURED. (2) HOW TIGHT IS TIGHT ON THE SCREW? NO INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED? (3) EXCESSIVE RELIANCE ON THE OWNER TO CHECK THIS PART FOR THE LIFE OF THE CAR - SERVICE MANAGER SAYS THIS MUST BE INTERMITTENTLY TIGHTENED BY THE OWNER? WHERE IS THIS IN THE SERVICE MANUAL? (4) IT ALSO APPEARS THAT TOYOTA MAY HAVE INTRODUCED THIS "EASY TO REMOVE" DESIGN TO APPEAL TO THOSE CUSTOMERS WHICH COMPLAINED ON HOW LONG IT TAKES TO REMOVE THE EARLIER MODEL ROOF RACKS (<2011), BUT IN TURN HAVE COMPROMISED ON QUALITY AND MORE IMPORTANTLY SAFETY. (5) NOT ONLY IS THIS A UNIQUE DESIGN FOR THE TOYOTA LINEUP OF CARS, IT IS ALSO A UNIQUE IN THE INDUSTRY DESIGN, WHICH HAS FOR MANY YEARS NOW ESTABLISHED A HISTORY OF HAVING POSITIVE LOCKING AND REDUNDANT INSTALLATIONS FOR ROOF RACK CROSS BARS. I WROTE LETTER, AND TOYOTA SAID OUR INSURANCE COVERS SUCH THINGS, AND FOR US TO WORK WITH OUR DEALER, RATHER THAN MAIN COMPANY. UPDATED IVOQ 03/20/12 *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 11V560000 (EQUIPMENT); HOWEVER, THE PART NEEDED TO DO THE REPAIR WAS UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE MANUFACTURER AND DEALER WERE NOTIFIED OF THE ISSUE. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE. MA 09/03/15

TL* TAKATA RECALL. THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBERS: 16V340000 (AIR BAGS) AND 11V560000 (EQUIPMENT). THE PART TO DO THE REPAIR WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE ISSUE. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE. VIN TOOL CONFIRMS PARTS NOT AVAILABLE. UPDATED 10/28/16*LJ

SUMMARY: TOYOTA IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011 THROUGH 2012 SIENNA VEHICLES FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NUMBER 110, TIRE SELECTIONS AND RIMS. THESE VEHICLES DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT FOR DISPLAYING THE CORRECT VEHICLE CAPACITY WEIGHT AS THE RATED LOAD FOR THE COMBINATION OF CARGO AND OCCUPANTS. SAFETY RISK: INCORRECT INFORMATION ON THE VEHICLE PLACARD MAY LEAD TO TIRE OVERLOADING AND POSSIBLY CAUSE TIRE FAILURE INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH. REMEDY: TOYOTA WILL NOTIFY OWNERS, AND WILL PROVIDE A REMEDY WHEN IT IS AVAILABLE. TOYOTA WILL MAIL OUT A CORRECTED PLACARD TO CUSTOMERS ALONG WITH REVISED OWNER MANUAL INFORMATION. THIS SERVICE WILL BE PERFORMED FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON JUNE 27, 2013. OWNERS MAY CONTACT TOYOTA AT 1-800-331-4331. RECALL STATUS: RECALL INCOMPLETE

SUMMARY: THE SUBJECT VEHICLES ARE EQUIPPED WITH FRONT PASSENGER AIRBAG INFLATORS PRODUCED BY TAKATA. ACCORDING TO TAKATA, THE PROPELLANT IN THESE INFLATORS MAY DEGRADE AFTER PROLONGED EXPOSURE TO HIGH ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY AND FLUCTUATING HIGH TEMPERATURES. DEGRADED PROPELLANT CAN CAUSE INFLATOR RUPTURE DURING AIRBAG DEPLOYMENT. SAFETY RISK: IN THE EVENT OF AN INFLATOR RUPTURE, METAL FRAGMENTS COULD PASS THROUGH THE AIRBAG CUSHION MATERIAL, STRIKING THE VEHICLE OCCUPANTS, AND RESULT IN SERIOUS INJURY OR DEATH. REMEDY: TOYOTA IS CURRENTLY PREPARING THE REMEDY FOR THIS CONDITION AND WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AS IT BECOMES AVAILABLE. THE REMEDY, WHEN AVAILABLE, WILL CONSIST OF THE REPLACEMENT OF THE AIRBAG INFLATOR OR THE AIRBAG ASSEMBLY, DEPENDING ON THE VEHICLE MODEL. RECALL STATUS: RECALL INCOMPLETE. REMEDY NOT YET AVAILABLE

TL* TAKATA RECALL. THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBERS: 16V858000, 16V340000, AND 11V560000 (STRUCTURE, AIR BAGS, EQUIPMENT). THE PARTS TO DO THE REPAIR WERE UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE DEALER WAS NOT CONTACTED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED THREE MONTHS AGO AND STATED THAT THEY WOULD SEND THE PARTS TO URBANA, IL. A CASE NUMBER WAS PROVIDED. THE CONTACT HAD NOT EXPERIENCED A FAILURE. PARTS DISTRIBUTION DISCONNECT. UPDATED 11/01/17*LJ *TR

VEHICLE WAS TRAVELING AT APPROXIMATELY 35-40 MPH, WHEN STRUCK IN THE FRONT DRIVERS SIDE BY A VEHICLE ATTEMPTING TO CROSS ROADWAY. NONE OF THE VEHICLES AIR BAGS DEPLOYED DESPITE EXTENSIVE DAMAGE TO DRIVERS SIDE FRONT. *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA WITH 18,600 MILES. THE CONTACT HAD THE VEHICLES STEERING MODIFIED BECAUSE OF A HANDICAP. THE CONTACT RECEIVED THE RECALL NOTICE 10V620000, SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC:PEDALS AND LINKAGES. WHEN THE CONTACT TOOK THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER TO HAVE THE RECALL PERFORMED, HE WAS TOLD THAT THEY COULD NOT DO THE WORK DUE TO THE PREVIOUS MODIFICATION TO THE VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED, BUT THEY HAD NOT OFFERED ANY ASSISTANCE. UPDATED 03/14/12 *BF

EXCESSIVE TIRE WEAR TO VEHICLE FRONT TIRES DETECTED AFTER 5,846 MILES. ALIGNMENT CHECKED BY DEALER. NEW FRONT TIRES WERE INSTALLED USING A 65,000 MILE RATED TIRE. AT 22,000 (16,000 MILES FROM TIME OF REPLACEMENT) EXCESSIVE WEAR (TO STEEL CORDS) NOTED TO NEW FRONT TIRES. MANUFACTURER CLAIMS THERE IS NO MECHANICAL/DESIGN DEFECT IN VEHICLE. EXCESSIVE AND PREMATURE TIRE WEAR IS CREATING POTENTIALLY UNSAFE DRIVING/OPERATING CONDITIONS. *TR

I BELIEVE THERE POTENTIALLY MAY BE A SERIOUS DESIGN CONCERN WITH THE POWER DOORS. DUE TO HAVING THREE SMALL CHILDREN, I HAVE THE CHILD LOCKS ENGAGED ON THE REAR SLIDING DOORS, WHICH ALSO DISABLES THE REAR DOOR BUTTONS FROM OPENING (BUT NOT FROM CLOSING) THE POWER DOORS. THE BUTTONS IN THE FRONT OF THE VEHICLE TO OPERATE THE POWER DOORS ARE NOT AFFECTED BY THE CHILD LOCKS, BUT ARE LOCATED ON THE CENTER ROOF CONSOLE, IN EASY REACH OF A CHILD STANDING IN THE SECOND ROW. TONIGHT, IN MATTER OF SECONDS BETWEEN ME EXITING THE DRIVERS SEAT AND WALKING AROUND THE VEHICLE TO THE PASSENGER SIDE SLIDING DOOR, ONE OF MY SONS PRESSED THE BUTTON TO OPEN THE SLIDING POWER DOOR, WHILE MY DAUGHTER STARTED TO EXIT THE VEHICLE. MY THIRD CHILD THEN PRESSED A BUTTON AGAIN, CAUSING THE POWER DOOR TO SHUT ON MY DAUGHTER'S NECK. FORTUNATELY, THE SAFETY SYSTEM REVERSED THE DOOR, BUT IT INFLICTED PAIN AND TEARS AND LEFT REDNESS ON MY DAUGHTER'S NECK; THERE IS NO APPARENT LASTING INJURY, BUT I AM CONCERNED THE INJURIES COULD HAVE BEEN MUCH MORE SERIOUS. I AM ALSO CONCERNED THAT THE PLACEMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ELECTRONIC CONTROLS FOR THE REAR DOORS IN EASY REACH OF CHILDREN IN THE REAR COMPLETELY DEFEATS THE PURPOSE OF HAVING CHILD LOCKS ON THE REAR DOORS. ALSO RELATED TO THE REAR DOORS, WE HAVE REPEATEDLY EXPERIENCED THE PROBLEM REPORTED BY OTHERS OF THE POWER DOORS JAMMING IN A PARTIALLY OPEN POSITION AND HAVING TO BE SLOWLY PUSHED CLOSED MANUALLY (WITH GREAT RESISTANCE), BEFORE THEY WILL FUNCTION AGAIN NORMALLY IN EITHER POWER OR MANUAL MODE. THIS COULD BE A SAFETY CONCERN THAT COULD IMPEDE THE ABILITY TO EXIT THE VEHICLE IN AN EMERGENCY. *TT

I HAVE LOVED MY 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA FOR 5-6 MOS. NOW. UPON BACKING UP IN MY FLAT DRIVEWAY AREA ON 10/24/11, AT A SLOW RATE TYPICAL TO BACKING UP IN A DRIVEWAY, I FOUND MY VAN PROPELLING VERY FAST STRAIGHT BACK/IN REVERSE. THIS TOOK THE VEHICLE DOWN OVER A SLIGHT HILL OF OUR YARD INTO A LARGE PINE TREE. THE THICK SPRUCE TREE HAS A HUGE HOLE/OPENING/DAMAGED AREA AND MY ENTIRE BACK OF THE VAN IS VERY DAMAGED, ENTIRE REAR WINDOW BUSTED INTO HUNDREDS OF SMALLER PIECES, ITEMS IN THE CAR PROJECTED ONTO THE GROUND BEHIND US. THE LIFTGATE, REAR WINDOW AND BUMPER ARE VERY CAVED IN AND DAMAGED. I CAN ONLY DESCRIBE THIS AS SECONDS OF TOTAL CONFUSION, SPEED, LACK OF CONTROL, SHOCK. I'M FEELING LIKE THE VAN IS "POSSESSED", AND I WILL NOT DRIVE IT AT ALL AGAIN. I DID NOT WITNESS ANY INDICATORS OF ANY ACCELERATOR ISSUES IN THE 5-6 MOS. I'VE OWNED IT. I WOULD BE LYING IF I SAID I WAS POSITIVE I WAS STILL BACKING UP OR IF I WAS IN THE PROCESS OF PREPARING TO BRAKE AND SHIFT INTO DRIVE TO PULL FORWARD AND OUT OF MY DRIVEWAY. THIS HAPPENED SO QUICKLY FOR DOING SOMETHING AT SUCH A VERY SLOW REVERSE SPEED, THAT THE DETAILS IN THAT SECOND IT ALL CHANGED AND ACCELERATED, I CAN NOT SAY FOR SURE WHAT SPECIFICS WERE BEING DONE AT THAT VERY MOMENT OF DRASTIC CHANGE IN SPEED. I'VE ALWAYS LOVED TOYOTAS. WE'VE HAD A FEW NOW. THIS IS THE LAST ONE I WILL BUY BECAUSE I JUST CAN NOT EXPLAIN WHY OR WHAT OCCURRED TO MAKE IT GO FROM SINGLE DIGITS IN REVERSE TO VERY QUICKLY SPEEDING IN REVERSE. I'M TALKING 12 YARDS OF SPACE WHERE IT WENT FROM NORMAL, SLOW BACKING UP TO INCREDIBLY FAST, THEN IMPACT. I CAN'T SAY IF THE CAR EVEN STALLED WHEN IT STOPPED. I CAN'T RECALL IF I SHUT IF OFF. I WAS FAR MORE CONCERNED ABOUT GETTING OUT AND CHECKING ON MY 4 YEAR OLD WHO WAS LUCKILY UNHARMED IN HER 5 POINT HARNESS HIGH BACK CAR SEAT. I KNOW IT SOUNDS ODD-IT WAS MORE ODD THAN ANYONE CAN IMAGINE! *TT

THE POWER SLIDING DOORS ON BOTH SIDES STOPPED WORKING. MUST OPEN AND CLOSE THE SLIDING DOORS MANUALLY. NONE OF THE OPEN BUTTONS ON THE CAR OR REMOTE RESPONDS TO OPENING THE SLIDING DOORS. JUST A BEEP IS HEARD WHEN THE KEY IS PRESSED. *TR

MY CONCERN IS THE DEAD ZONE CREATED BY THE HEAD LIGHTS ON MY CAR. THE PROJECTION OF THE HEADLIGHTS ON MY CAR ARE EXTREMELY DANGEROUS DUE TO THE DEAD ZONE IN FRONT OF THE VEHICLE. THE HEADLIGHTS HAVE BEEN ADJUSTED MULTIPLE TIMES AND THE DEALER RESPONSE IS" THAT IS JUST THE WAY THESE NEW HEADLIGHTS ARE". ON DARK ROADS IT IS HIGHLY PROBABLE THAT AN ACCIDENT MAY OCCUR BECAUSE YOU CANNOT SEE WHERE YOU ARE GOING AND IF THERE IS A SLIGHT CURVE TO THE ROAD IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO TELL WHICH WAY THE ROAD IS GOING. ON MY LAST TRIP AT NIGHT WE HAD 3 OCCASIONS THAT IF WE HAD NOT FLASHED THE HIGH BEAMS WE MOST CERTAINLY WOULD HAVE A WRECK. *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA. THE CONTACT STATED THE DRIVER'S SIDE AUTOMATIC SLIDING DOOR JAMMED AND FAILED TO RELEASE OPEN UNTIL BODY FORCE WAS APPLIED TO THE DOOR. THE FAILURE OCCURRED FIFTY TIMES. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER TWICE AND THEY WERE UNABLE TO DUPLICATE THE MALFUNCTION. THE CONTACT PLANNED TO NOTIFY THE MANUFACTURER OF THE DEFECT. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 8,000.

DURING THE TEST DRIVE AND INSPECTION OF 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA VAN THE DRIVER'S SIDE REAR SLIDING DOOR WOULD CLOSE WITHOUT TOUCHING THE BUTTON OR HANDLE. THE DEALER (REP) TOLD ME THAT HE HAD PRESSED THE CLOSE BUTTON TOO MANY TIMES AND THAT'S WHY IT SHUT DURING THE INSPECTION OF THE VEHICLE. AFTER TAKING THE VEHICLE HOME THE DRIVER'S REAR SLIDING DOOR SHUT ON ME WHILE I WAS GETTING A SMALL CHILD OUT OF A CAR SEAT-I DID NOT TOUCH THE BUTTON OR DOOR HANDLE. AFTER THE SAME THING HAPPENED 4-5 MORE TIME I TOOK THE 2011 SIENNA VAN BACK TO THE DEALER AND TOLD THEM THAT I WOULD NOT TAKE THE VEHICLE BACK UNTIL THE PROBLEM WAS FIXED. THE DEALER REPLACED THE MOTORS IN BOTH SLIDING DOORS. THE PROBLEMS HAS CONTINUED AND AFTER RESEARCH HAVE FOUND THAT THIS IS A COMMON COMPLAINT REGARDING THE SLIDING DOORS ON THE SIENNA VANS. BETWEEN TIRE PROBLEMS AND DOOR PROBLEMS IT'S NOT WORTH THE TIME OR HASSLE. *TR

I WAS OUT IN THE FRONT PORCH NEAR MY GARAGE AROUND 7:30PM AND MY SIENNA WAS PARKED INSIDE THE GARAGE. SUDDENLY A LOUD NOISE LIKE AN EXPLOSION OF SORT OCCURRED THAT SCARED ME PRETTY BAD THAT PROMPTED ME TO LOOK INSIDE THE GARAGE AND I WAS SHOCKED TO SEE TWO LARGE HOLES SIMULTANEOUSLY ON EITHER SIDE (LEFT AND RIGHT) OF THE REAR WINDSHIELD AND THE GLASS WAS SLOWLY CAVING OUT AND THEN SHATTERED COMPLETELY IN (NOT SPIDER-WEB LIKE) SLOWLY FALLING AWAY INTO THE TRUNK. AFTER COMING BACK TO MY SENSES FROM THE INITIAL SHOCK, I CALLED MY INSURANCE COMPANY TO SEE IF THEY HAD HEARD OF SUCH FREAK INCIDENTS TO WHICH THEY SAID 'YES'. THEY DID MENTION TO GO TO THE DEALER AND SINCE IT IS STILL BRAND NEW (LESS THAN 9 MONTHS OLD), THE GLASS WILL BE REPLACED UNDER MANUFACTURER WARRANTY. I WENT TO[XXX] IN ARLINGTON, TX FROM WHOM I HAD PURCHASED THE VAN ALONG WITH THEIR DEALER WARRANTY ON TOP OF THE MANUFACTURER WARRANTY AND AFTER THEIR SERVICE MANAGER LOOKED AT THE NON-EXISTENT WINDSHIELD WITH SOME OF THE GLASS STILL HANGING ON TO THE EDGES, HE SAID HE CANNOT MAKE A JUDGMENT AS TO WHETHER IT WAS A MANUFACTURER'S DEFECT OR VANDALISM SINCE THERE IS NO WAY TO KNOW AS THE GLASS IS NOT IN THE WINDSHIELD ANYMORE (??!!!). I TOLD THEM THAT IF THE GLASS SHATTERS, IT WILL NOT BE INTACT AND YET THEY WOULD NOT BUY MY ARGUMENT. I CALLED TOYOTA CORPORATE AND THEY SAID UNLESS THE DEALER MAKES THE JUDGMENT, THEY CANNOT PROCEED WITH REPLACEMENT OF THE WINDSHIELD. I SINCERELY URGE THE NHTSA TO INQUIRE THIS INCIDENT SINCE IF IT HAD OCCURRED WHILE DRIVING, THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN A SERIOUS RISK OF DEATH OR INJURY CAUSED DUE TO THE SUDDEN SHOCK. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6).*TR

VEHICLE WAS IN PARK ON A FLAT STREET. I WANTED TO MOVE THE VEHICLE FORWARD, SO I DEPRESSED THE BRAKE, AND BEGAN SHIFTING THE (AUTOMATIC) SHIFTER TO DRIVE. THE GEAR SHIFT LEVER NEVER MADE IT TO THE DRIVE POSITION. AS I MOVED THE LEVER, THE CAR SHOT BACKWARDS, STRIKING A VEHICLE BEHIND ME WITH TREMENDOUS FORCE. I HAVE HAD THE SAME MODEL CAR FOR OVER 7 YEARS AND NEVER HAD THIS HAPPEN. I CANNOT FIGURE OUT HOW OR WHY THE CAR ACCELERATED (FORCEFULLY) IN REVERSE AS I WAS SHIFTING INTO DRIVE. *TT

TOYOTA SEND ME A RECALL LETTER STILL TRYING TO GET IT FIX NHTSA NO. 16V-340 &17V-006

I HEARD AN EXTREMELY LOUD EXPLOSION SOUND COMING FROM THE ROOF OF MY 2011 SIENNA JUST RIGHT AFTER I GOT ONTO A HIGHWAY AND WAS TRAVELING ABOUT 40MPH. THE SURROUNDING WAS CLEAR WHEN IT HAPPENED. I CALLED THE POLICE WHO FOUND OUT THAT THE SUNROOF GLASS BULGED UP AND SHATTERED. THE POLICE COULDN'T FIND ANY SIGNS OF ROCKS HITTING THE SUNROOF AND BASED ON THE GLASS BREAKAGE PATTERN SUSPECTED THAT THE CAR'S INTERIOR CABIN PRESSURE MIGHT HAVE CAUSED THE SUNROOF GLASS TO EXPLODE AND BREAK. HOWEVER, THE TEMPERATURE AT THE TIME WAS ONLY AROUND 65'F, SO IT COULDN'T BE DUE TO HEAT. THE POLICE SUSPECTED THE SUNROOF GLASS COULD BE A DEFECTIVE PART AND ASKED ME TO FOLLOW UP WITH A TOYOTA DEALER. *TR

ON SEPT 14, 2011 WHILE MY SON WAS IN THE SECOND ROW BUCKET SEAT ON THE PASSENGERS SIDE HIS SEAT BELT FAILED. THE FEMALE END OF THE SEAT BELT WHICH IS ANCHORED TO THE FLOOR, SEPARATED FROM THE FLOOR WHILE STILL BUCKLED. *KB

PURCHASED OUR NEW 2011 SIENNA XLE AWD IN JULY 2010, FROM KOONS TOYOTA IN WESTMINSTER, MD. IN EARLY SEPTEMBER 2011, MY WIFE COMPLAINED OF A BAD ODOR IN THE VAN. ON 09/10/11 I COMBED THROUGH THE VAN, THINKING THAT ONE OF OUR CHILDREN HAD SPILLED OR DROPPED SOMETHING THAT WAS CAUSING THE SMELL. INSTEAD, I FOUND THAT THE FLOOR OF THE VAN, UNDER THE CARPETS, WAS SOAKED THROUGHOUT. I IMMEDIATELY CALLED THE DEALER, AND THEY PICKED UP THE VAN ON 09/12/2011. THE FOLLOWING DAY I RECEIVED A CALL FROM THE DEALER'S SERVICE ADVISOR, WHO INFORMED ME THAT THE PROBLEM WAS WORSE HAD BEEN IMMEDIATELY APPARENT: WATER WAS ACTUALLY POOLING UNDER THE CARPETS. HE ALSO SAID THEIR MECHANICS HAD SPEND ALL DAY ON THE PROBLEM AND HAD NOT BEEN ABLE TO DETERMINE HOW THE WATER HAD SEEPED INTO THE CAR, AND THAT THE NEXT STEP WAS FOR A TOYOTA REGIONAL SPECIALIST TO LOOK AT THE VAN, THAT WEEK. A FEW DAYS LATER, THAT HAPPENED, BUT THAT TECHNICIAN, TOO, WAS UNABLE TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM. AS A RESULT, THE DEALER ESSENTIALLY SAID IT WAS MY PROBLEM. I THEN CALLED TOYOTA USA HQ AND, TOO, MY INSURANCE COMPANY (USAA); WITH THE FORMER, I INITIATED A CASE/COMPLAINT, WITH THE LATTER, A COMPREHENSIVE CLAIM. ON SEPTEMBER 22, I SENT TOYOTA HQ A CERTIFIED LETTER WHICH, 1) REQUESTED THAT THE COMPANY REPLACE OR BUY BACK OUR VAN, AND 2) GAVE NOTICE THAT I WAS FILING A LEMON LAW COMPLAINT WITH THE MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL'S CONSUMER PROTECTION AFFAIRS OFFICE. IN THE MEANTIME, MY COMPREHENSIVE INSURANCE COVERED THE WATER REMEDIATION EFFORT OF CARPET AND MATERIALS REPLACEMENT, NOTWITHSTANDING THE FACT THAT THE SOURCE OF THE WATER INTRUSION WAS NEVER DIAGNOSED. ON 10/07/2011, I RECEIVED NOTICE FROM THE DEALER THAT THE "REPAIRS" (I.E., CARPETS, SOUND-DEADENER REPLACED, CAR "OXINATED" (SP?), AND DETAILED), BUT THAT THE SMELL WAS STILL THERE. AFTER ONE MONTH NO ANSWER TO WHY A NEW $40K VAN IS SOAKED INSIDE. *TR

SATELLITE BUTTONS OVERHEAD CONSOLE FOR SLIDING DOORS ARE NOW INOPERABLE FOR DRIVER'S SIDE SLIDING DOOR. TOOK TO DEALER WHO AFTER SEEING THE ISSUE CAME BACK AND SAID UNABLE TO DUPLICATE.VERY CONCERNED...... *TR

SUDDEN UNCOMMANDED ACCELERATION WHILE STOPPED FOR A RED LIGHT. *TR

FRONT PASSENGER SEAT BACK TILTS FORWARD SLIGHTLY WHEN BRAKING. THIS CAUSES THE SEAT BACK TO FEEL LOOSE AND LIKE YOU'RE MOVING FORWARD IN THE SEAT WHEN BRAKING. DRIVER'S SEAT DOES NOT HAVE THE ISSUE. *TR

AFTER ARRIVING HOME WITH MY 2 KIDS YESTERDAY, WE WERE GETTING OUT OF THE VEHICLE (2011 TOYOTA SIENNA XLE)- MY 2 1/2YR OLD DAUGHTER WAS GETTING OUT OF THE PASSENGER SIDE POWER DOOR WHILE I WAS ABOUT TO GET MY 3 MONTH OLD SON OUT OF THE DRIVER SIDE POWER DOOR. MY 2 1/2YR OLD DAUGHTER PUSHED THE POWER DOOR BUTTON TO CLOSE HER DOOR AFTER GETTING OUT OF THE VEHICLE AND WAS HOLDING ONTO THE VAN TO GAIN HER GROUND, AT WHICH TIME THE POWER SLIDING DOOR CLOSED ENTIRELY ON HER RIGHT HAND! IT DID NOT OPEN WITH THE DOOR SENSOR AS WE WERE TOLD IT WOULD DO IF ANYTHING WAS IN THE PATH OF THE DOOR CLOSING. WHEN I FRANTICALLY TRIED TO PULL OPEN THE DOOR FROM THE INSIDE, AND PUSH THE POWER DOOR BUTTON, THE DOOR WOULD NOT OPEN AND SHE JUST KEPT SCREAMING FROM THE OTHER SIDE. I HAD TO PUT THE KEYS BACK IN THE IGNITION JUST TO OPEN THE DOOR AND FREE MY DAUGHTER! IT WAS A PROLONGED, SCARY AND TRAUMATIZING ORDEAL THAT I HOPE NO ONE ELSE EVER HAS TO EXPERIENCE! WHEN YOU ARE TOLD THE POWER DOORS AND WINDOWS ARE ON A SENSOR THEY NEED TO ACTUALLY FUNCTION 100%, NOT ONLY FOR A LARGE OBJECT LIKE A BODY OBSTRUCTING THE DOOR/WINDOW, BUT ALSO CHILDREN'S HANDS- AFTER ALL THIS IS A FAMILY VEHICLE THAT I WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION WAS BUILT ON SAFETY! *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING 50 MPH, THE FACTORY INSTALLED TELEVISION SCREEN WAS OBSTRUCTING THE FIELD OF VISION THROUGH THE REAR VIEW MIRROR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE AND A COMPLAINT WAS FILED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 1,200.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA. THE CONTACT RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FOR NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 16V858000 (STRUCTURE). THE PARTS TO DO THE REPAIR WERE UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED OF THE ISSUE. IN ADDITION, THE CONTACT OBSERVED AN ABNORMAL NOISE AND MOVEMENT FROM THE REAR SEATS. THE DEALER WAS UNABLE TO DUPLICATE THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN. VIN TOOL CONFIRMS PARTS NOT AVAILABLE. UPDATED 04/19/17 LJ *CN

FOR EVERY MAINTENANCE SERVICE THROUGH TOYOTA CARE, I POINTED MY CONCERNS ON A STEERING "POP" SOUND WHILE MAKING U-TURNS UNDER VERY LOW SPEED, AND A SENSE OF STEERING INSTABILITY ON HIGHWAYS UNDER WINDY CONDITIONS, AS WELL AS WEARING TIRES RAPIDLY. ALL THE TIME THE DEALERS TECHNICIANS ANSWER WAS: "A GREEN REPORT FOR EVERY SAFETY POINT, SUSPENSION AND ALIGNMENT WAS PROOF OF NO PROBLEMS AT ALL". I AM REPLACING 4 TIRES (TO SERVE 65 000) AT 45 000 MILES TOTALLY WORN OUT WITH UNEVEN PATTERNS SPECIALLY THE ONES AT FRONT WHEELS, EVEN FOLLOWING REGULAR ROTATION PROGRAM. I THINK WOULD BE GOOD TO POST THIS INFORMATION, KNOWING OTHERS CONCERNS IN THE SAME MATTER AND TO BRING THE MANUFACTURERS ATTENTION FOR POSSIBLE RECALL IN THIS ISSUE. *TR

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 25 MPH, SHE APPLIED THE BRAKES AND THE PEDAL DEPRESSED TO THE FLOOR. THE VEHICLE WOULD NOT STOP UNTIL CRASHING INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE. A POLICE REPORT WAS FILED, BUT NO INJURIES WERE REPORTED. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT REPAIR SHOP WHERE THE CONTACT WAS AWAITING DIAGNOSIS OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 4,800. UPDATED 08/10/11*LJ UPDATED 08/12/11. *JB

2011 SIENNA LE REAR VIEW MIRROR VIBRATES WHILE CAR ENGINE IS TURNED ON AND WHEN CAR IS IN DRIVING VIBRATE TO THE POINT THAT MAKES A PERSON DIZZY. SPOKE TO TOYOTA SERVICE REGARDING THIS SAFTY CONCERN, BUT WE WERE TOLD THAT THE VIBRATION ON THE MIRROR COMES WITH A CAR DESIGN, NOT A MALFUNCTIONAL PART, REFUSE TO REPLACE OR ATTEMP TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6) *TT

THE DAY AFTER PICKING UP MY NEW 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA MINIVAN, I NOTICED A DISTORTION ACROSS THE LOWER 3" OF THE WINDSHIELD. IT IS VERY DISTRACTING, AS THE PAINT STRIPES ON THE ROAD "BEND" TOWARDS THE DRIVER. IT'S WORSE AT NIGHT. *TT

PURCHASED A 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA LIMITED ON JUNE 25TH. NEXT MORNING, AFTER THE CAR HAD BEEN IN DRY WEATHER AND GARAGED OVERNIGHT, I PULLED IT OUT TO FIND THE ENTIRE REAR STORAGE AREA BY THE BACK DOOR WAS SOAKING WET WITH WATER STANDING IN PUDDLES AND THE REAR WELDS CORRODED. IT IS APPARENT THE WATER HAS BEEN THERE FOR SOME TIME. AFTER WRINGING OUT 4 BEACH TOWELS, I PUT AN INDUSTRIAL FAN ON IT FOR 5 HOURS. IT'S STILL WET. *TR

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING AT APPROXIMATELY 10 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS APPLIED AND THE VEHICLE HESITATED TO STOP. THE FAILURE RECURRED NUMEROUS TIMES. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE CONTACT ALSO STATED THAT THE WINDOWS FAILED TO OPERATE AND THE SLIDING DOORS FAILED TO STOP AUTOMATICALLY. THE FAILURE RECURRED MULTIPLE TIMES. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE THE WINDOWS WERE REPAIRED BUT THE SLIDING DOORS WERE NOT. THE SPECIFICS OF THE REPAIRS WERE UNKNOWN. THE CONTACT ALSO STATED THAT THE VEHICLE FAILED TO START AND REQUIRED TO BE JUMP STARTED. THE FAILURE OCCURRED INTERMITTENTLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE THE BATTERY WAS REPLACED BUT THE FAILURE RECURRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 100.

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 15 MPH, THE REAR PASSENGER SLIDING DOOR OPENED WITHOUT WARNING. THE FAILURE RECURRED NUMEROUS TIMES. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER, BUT WAS NOT DIAGNOSED OR REPAIRED. THE CONTACT RECEIVED NOTIFICATION OF NHTSA CAMPAIGN NUMBER: 16V858000 (STRUCTURE) AND STATED THAT THE PART NEEDED FOR THE REPAIR WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MANUFACTURER EXCEEDED A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME FOR THE RECALL REPAIR. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 1,500. VIN TOOL CONFIRMS PARTS NOT AVAILABLE.

BOTH POWER-SLIDING SIDE VAN DOORS ON MY 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA XLE AWD DO NOT FUNCTION PROPERLY OR SAFELY IN ALL INSTANCES WHEN USING THE EXTERIOR DOOR HANDLES. APPROXIMATELY 25% OF ATTEMPTS TO OPEN THE SIDE DOORS USING THE EXTERIOR DOOR HANDLES TO ACTIVATE THE POWER SLIDE MECHANISM FAIL. THE FAILURE RESULTS IN THE DOORS ONLY OPENING ABOUT SIX INCHES, THEN STOPPING IN PLACE WHILE AN AUDIBLE ALARM SOUNDS. THE GAP IS LARGE ENOUGH FOR AN ADULT OR CHILD TO PUT ARM THROUGH THE GAP. AFTER THE AUDIBLE ALARM CEASES, THE DOOR CAN BE MANUALLY CLOSED IN A "JERKY" FASHION. THE DOOR FAILURE ONLY HAPPENS WHEN USING THE EXTERIOR HANDLES. WHEN USING THE KEY FOB, INTERIOR CONTROLS LOCATED IN THE CEILING ABOVE THE REAR VIEW MIRROR, OR INTERIOR CONTROLS NEAR THE SLIDING DOORS, THE DOORS WORK CORRECTLY. *TR

MOTOR ON SLIDING DOORS HAVE NOT WORKED PROPERLY SINCE WE FIRST PURCHASED IT BRAND NEW. WE WERE TOLD THEY "STICK" BECAUSE THE RUBBER SEALS ARE SO NEW. THE DOORS ONLY OPEN PART OF THE TIME. 50% OF THE TIME WHEN YOU OPEN THEM, THEY BEEP LOUDLY AND GET STUCK, JUST LIKE DAY ONE. TOYOTA CONTINUES TO CLAIM THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH IT AND ANYTIME WE'VE MENTIONED IT, THEY SAY THEY FOUND NO PROBLEMS. IT'S A SAFETY HAZARD BECAUSE THEY GET JAMMED AND CAN ONLY BE YANKED OPEN MANUALLY. A CHILD COULD NOT OPEN IT IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY WHERE THEY NEED TO MAKE A QUICK ESCAPE. THE SEAL ON THE WINDOW IS ALSO BROKEN AND PULLS DOWN WHEN YOU OPEN THE WINDOW . THE SEAL PULLS DOWN WITH IT. THIS HAPPENED TO OUR BRAND-NEW TOYOTA CAMRY, AS WELL AS MY MOTHER'S BRAND NEW TOYOTA FJ CRUISER. TOYOTA HAS CHECKED IT OUT AND THEY CLAIMED IT'S WEAR AND TEAR. THEY REPLACED IT FOR FREE THE FIRST TIME, BUT LESS THAN A YEAR LATER IT HAPPENED AGAIN! NOW I SEE A RECALL ON DOORS, THIS NEEDS TO B ADDRESSED, THAT RECALL IS NOT BEING HANDLED YET EITHER . AGAIN, IT'S A SAFETY HAZARD FOR CHILDREN GETTING OUT, OR DOORS FLYING OPEN WHEN VEHICLE IS IN MOTION.

I BOUGHT A BRAND NEW 2011 TOYOTA SIENNA XLE IN MAY OF 2011 FROM JAY WOLFE TOYOTA IN KANSAS CITY MO. AFTER 1000 MILES WITHIN LESS THAN A MONTH, STARTED HAVING BRAKE PROBLEMS. WHEN I PRESS THE BRAKE, IT WAS GLIDING, TAKING THE PADDLE TO THE FLOOR IN ORDER TO STOP THE VEHICLE EVEN AT SLOW SPEEDS. I WAS ENROUTE TO OMAHA FOR THE WEEKEND WITH MY FAMILY AND KIDS WHEN I STARTED HAVING THE BRAKE PROBLEM. I TOOK THE VEHICLE BACK TO THE DEALERSHIP AND THEY TOOK 4 DAYS TO CHECK AND DETERMINE IT WAS AIR IN THE BRAKE SYSTEM. I AM SURE THERE WAS MORE TO IT BUT THAT IS ALL THEY SAID AND FIXED. ONE PERSON FROM CORPORATE WAS THERE AND TOLD US AND GUARANTEED THAT WE SHOULD NEVER SEE THIS PROBLEM AGAIN. NOW LESS THAN A YEAR AFTER AT 26000 MILES STARTED HAVING SAME ISSUES WITH BRAKE. NOW THE DEALERSHIP SAYS THERE MAY BE A LEAK IN THE BRAKE SYSTEM THAT MAY NOT HAVE BEEN LOOK AT BEFORE. I ADVISED THEM DUE TO SAFETY OF MY FAMILY AND MY KIDS AND OTHERS ON THE ROAD, I AM NOT TAKING THIS VEHICLE BACK AND I REQUESTED TO BE REPLACED WITH ANOTHER NEW VEHICLE SINCE THEY ARE AT FAULT BY SELLING ME A VEHICLE WITH A BRAKE PROBLEM AND BY NOT FIXING IT RIGHT IN THE FIRST PLACE. NOTING THAT TOYOTA HAVE HAD PROBLEMS WITH MANY CARS WITH BRAKE FAILURE IN THE PAST. PLEASE ADVISE ME WHAT I WOULD NEED TO DO IN ORDER TO GET MY VEHICLE REPLACED FOR THE SAFETY OF MY FAMILY AND KIDS SINCE I NO LONGER FEEL SAFE BEING IN THE CURRENT VEHICLE. THANK YOU, *TR